Skip to main content

Pilkington CJ, Kern W and Indest D, Is actually safer sex required which have good “safe” companion?

Pilkington CJ, Kern W and Indest D, Is actually safer sex required which have good “safe” companion?

21. Ott MA et al., The fresh new trading-off ranging from hormone contraceptives and you may condoms among teens, Views to the Sexual and Reproductive Wellness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.

twenty two. Wilson EK and Koo Hp, Connections between reasonable-money ladies matchmaking features as well as their contraception fool around with, Point of views on the Sexual and you can Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.

23. Aalsma MC mais aussi al., Family and you will buddy closeness to help you teenage sexual partners inside the link to condom explore, Record regarding Teenage Wellness, 2006, 38(3):173–178.

24. Sayegh MA et al., The new developmental connection of relationships top quality, hormone contraceptive alternatives and you may condom low-explore certainly adolescent women, Log away from Teenage Fitness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.

25 how to find the women on victoriahearts. Umphrey L and Sherblom J, Relational relationship and you can threats to relationship restoration needs: impacts for the condom fool around with, Journal away from Western College Wellness, 2007, 56(1):61–68.

twenty seven. Manning WD ainsi que al., Young adult relationship relationship additionally the handling of sexual risk, Inhabitants Research and you can Plan Feedback, 2012, 31(2):165–185.

28. Manlove J et al., Teen parents for the foster care and attention: chance issues and you will results for youth and their pupils, Search Short term, Washington, DC: Child Manner, 2011.

30. DiClemente RJ mais aussi al., Sexual chance behaviors on the having old sex partners: an examination of black colored teenage female, Sexually Carried Ailment 2002, 29(1):20–24.

32. Fortenberry JD ainsi que al., Condom fool around with once the a purpose of amount of time in the new and you may depending teenage sexual dating, American Diary out of Societal Wellness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.

33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and Franzetta K, Chance and you can protective items of changeover in order to an initial sexual reference to an older mate, Log out-of Teenage Wellness, 2007, 40(2):135–143.

34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you will Franzetta K, Contraception use habits across teens’ sexual relationships, report presented in the yearly fulfilling of your People Association off The usa, Philadelphia, .

thirty-five. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop computer and Longmore MA, Connecting: the partnership contexts out-of “nonrelationship” sex, Diary out of Adolescent Browse, 2006, 21(5):459–483.

thirty-six. Carlson MJ and you may Furstenberg FF, Jr, The results from multi-hitched virility to own parental resources and you can matchmaking, papers displayed on annual appointment of the Organization to own Societal Plan Studies and Government, Arizona, DC, .

37. Lichter DT and Graefe DR, Searching for a mate? The latest marital and cohabitation records out-of unwed parents, in: Wu LL and Wolfe B, eds., From Wedlock: Explanations and Effects out of Nonmarital Virility, Nyc: Russell Sage Base, 2001, pp. 317–343.

40. Kirby D, Emerging Solutions 2007: Browse Results towards Applications to attenuate Adolescent Pregnancy and you may Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Arizona, DC: Federal Venture to cease Teenager and Unexpected Maternity, 2007.

41. Kirby D, The fresh impression out of apps to increase birth control fool around with among mature feminine: a glance at fresh and you can quasi-fresh degree, Perspectives to the Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40(1):34–41.

Author’s Affiliations

Jennifer Manlove is system town manager and elderly look researcher, Kate Welti was research scientist, E Wildsmith is senior research researcher and you may Megan Barry are lookup expert, most of the from the Youngster Trends, Bethesda, MD.


In the 1st data, which used a location-area shot out-of teenagers in Kansas, Manning and acquaintances nine categorized dating attributes towards the one list from positive characteristics (eg intimate care about-disclosure, intimate like and relationship salience) plus one directory away from bad functions (such as argument and nonexclusivity). It unearthed that higher ratings into the both directory had been in the quicker condom texture. Detailed analyses and additionally ideal that a variety of large confident and large negative scores is actually associated with the quicker condom consistency.

Into the for each round, people was indeed asked “Once the big date of last interview, are you presently in the an internet dating relationship the place you consider regarding oneself as part of a few?” I considered participants to be in a dating dating whenever they replied yes assuming the brand new partner is a current relationships companion, in place of a partner, cohabiting lover otherwise previous partner. Same-sex relationship dating and people where the respondent had previously cohabited on the companion was basically omitted. Overall, 4,013 participants claimed a recently available relationships matchmaking during 2002–2005. Of your kept participants, 553 just weren’t regarding shot when you look at the rounds of great interest, step 1,876 was indeed cohabiting or partnered, and you will dos,542 had no most recent relationships matchmaking. Participants inside our sample was indeed aged 18–twenty six.

Relationships union is actually based on a couple of methods. The first are a beneficial 0–10 scale in which participants ranked the chance which they and you will the partner could be to one another when you look at the six months. A rating off zero expressed not a chance; a beneficial 10 conveyed 100% likelihood. I categorized that it likelihood as reasonable (lower than 6), medium (6–9) or highest (10). With the 2nd measure of commitment, i provided an adjustable to own whether or not the couples got discussed wedding otherwise cohabitation; solutions was categorized as chatted about none, talked about cohabitation otherwise chatted about wedding. (Participants just who said which have discussed both cohabitation and you may relationship were included regarding the marriage category.)

Heterogeneous birth-control outcomes within this longer term relationship may also help define down birth prevention feel during the stretched adolescent dating, even with deeper likelihood of actually ever-entry to contraceptives. thirty two, 33 Earlier research has translated it trying to find by the positing one couples are willing to sometimes go without birth control use in more serious dating; thirty-two, 34 not, our very own results advise that shorter birth prevention fool around with can be concentrated in long-emergency room identity matchmaking described as highest conflict minimizing commitment.


20. Ku L, Sonenstein Florida and you may Pleck JH, The newest dynamics regarding young men’s condom use during the and you can all over relationship, Family relations Thought Perspectives, 1994, 26(6):246–251.

Leave a Reply